CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 14.1
vs Praktica Luxmedia 12-23

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 14.1

Praktica / 2010

DCZ 14.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 12-23

Praktica / 2010

Luxmedia 12-23

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DCZ 14.1
28 mm²
Luxmedia 12-23
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 14.1 and Luxmedia 12-23 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 14.1MetricLuxmedia 12-23
14 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 14.1 and Luxmedia 12-23 have the same sensor area. The DCZ 14.1 has the lighter body. The DCZ 14.1 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 14.1 and Luxmedia 12-23 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 14.1

Released in 2010, DCZ 14.1 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 12-23

Released in 2010, Luxmedia 12-23 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras