CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 10.3
vs Praktica Luxmedia 10-03

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 10.3

Praktica / 2009

DCZ 10.3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 10-03

Praktica / 2009

Luxmedia 10-03

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DCZ 10.3
28 mm²
Luxmedia 10-03
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The Luxmedia 10-03 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DCZ 10.3MetricLuxmedia 10-03
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight105 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Luxmedia 10-03 has the larger sensor area. The Luxmedia 10-03 has the lighter body. The DCZ 10.3 and Luxmedia 10-03 have the same effective resolution. The DCZ 10.3 and Luxmedia 10-03 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 10.3

Released in 2009, DCZ 10.3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 10-03

Released in 2009, Luxmedia 10-03 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras