CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 10.2
vs Praktica Luxmedia 10-23

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 10.2

Praktica / 2009

DCZ 10.2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 10-23

Praktica / 2009

Luxmedia 10-23

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DCZ 10.2
28 mm²
Luxmedia 10-23
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 10.2 and Luxmedia 10-23 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 10.2MetricLuxmedia 10-23
10.17 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.8 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.74 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 10.2 and Luxmedia 10-23 have the same sensor area. The DCZ 10.2 has the lighter body. The DCZ 10.2 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 10.2 and Luxmedia 10-23 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 10.2

Released in 2009, DCZ 10.2 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.17 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 10-23

Released in 2009, Luxmedia 10-23 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras