Reasons to choose DCZ 10.1
Released in 2009, DCZ 10.1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.37 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Praktica DCZ 10.1
vs Rollei RCP-10325X
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
DCZ 10.138 mm²
RCP-10325X- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DCZ 10.1 and RCP-10325X have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DCZ 10.1MetricRCP-10325X
10.37 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.91 µmPixel pitch1.95 µm
3.65 µm²Pixel area3.79 µm²
27.36 MP/cm²Pixel density26.39 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DCZ 10.1 and RCP-10325X have the same sensor area. The RCP-10325X has the lighter body. The DCZ 10.1 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 10.1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose RCP-10325X
Released in 2007, RCP-10325X has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.