CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 10.1
vs Praktica Luxmedia 12 HD

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 10.1

Praktica / 2009

DCZ 10.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 12 HD

Praktica / 2009

Luxmedia 12 HD

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DCZ 10.1
42 mm²
Luxmedia 12 HD
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
9.5%

The Luxmedia 12 HD has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DCZ 10.1MetricLuxmedia 12 HD
10.37 MPEffective pixels12 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.44 × 5.58
1.91 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
3.65 µm²Pixel area3.46 µm²
27.36 MP/cm²Pixel density28.91 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.65
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight136 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Luxmedia 12 HD has the larger sensor area. The DCZ 10.1 has the lighter body. The Luxmedia 12 HD has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 10.1 and Luxmedia 12 HD were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 10.1

Released in 2009, DCZ 10.1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.37 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 12 HD

Released in 2009, Luxmedia 12 HD has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 136 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras