CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DC Slim 5
vs Praktica Exakta DC 4200

Archive illustration for Praktica DC Slim 5

Praktica / 2005

DC Slim 5

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Exakta DC 4200

Praktica / 2004

Exakta DC 4200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DC Slim 5
38 mm²
Exakta DC 4200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC Slim 5 and Exakta DC 4200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC Slim 5MetricExakta DC 4200
5.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.73 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
7.43 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
13.46 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
95 gWeight196 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC Slim 5 and Exakta DC 4200 have the same sensor area. The DC Slim 5 has the lighter body. The DC Slim 5 has the higher effective resolution. The DC Slim 5 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC Slim 5

Released in 2005, DC Slim 5 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 95 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Exakta DC 4200

Released in 2004, Exakta DC 4200 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 196 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras