CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DC 50
vs Praktica Luxmedia 4008

Archive illustration for Praktica DC 50

Praktica / 2005

DC 50

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 4008

Praktica / 2004

Luxmedia 4008

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC 50
25 mm²
Luxmedia 4008
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC 50 and Luxmedia 4008 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 50MetricLuxmedia 4008
5.19 MPEffective pixels4.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.19 µmPixel pitch2.43 µm
4.79 µm²Pixel area5.91 µm²
20.89 MP/cm²Pixel density16.91 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
90 gWeight395 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 50 and Luxmedia 4008 have the same sensor area. The DC 50 has the lighter body. The DC 50 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 50 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 50

Released in 2005, DC 50 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.19 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 4008

Released in 2004, Luxmedia 4008 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 395 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras