CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DC 22
vs Praktica DC 44

Archive illustration for Praktica DC 22

Praktica / 2003

DC 22

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica DC 44

Praktica / 2004

DC 44

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
DC 22
25 mm²
DC 44
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The DC 44 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 22MetricDC 44
2.11 MPEffective pixels4.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.18 µmPixel pitch2.43 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area5.91 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density16.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight140 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 44 has the larger sensor area. The DC 44 has the lighter body. The DC 44 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 44 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 22

Released in 2003, DC 22 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC 44

Released in 2004, DC 44 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras