CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DC 20
vs Samsung Digimax 101

Archive illustration for Praktica DC 20

Praktica / 2004

DC 20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 101

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 101

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DC 20
31 mm²
Digimax 101
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC 20 and Digimax 101 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 20MetricDigimax 101
2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
90 gWeight125 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 20 and Digimax 101 have the same sensor area. The DC 20 has the lighter body. The DC 20 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 20 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 20

Released in 2004, DC 20 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 101

Released in 2002, Digimax 101 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras