CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DC 20
vs Praktica Digi 3 LM

Archive illustration for Praktica DC 20

Praktica / 2004

DC 20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Digi 3 LM

Praktica / 2005

Digi 3 LM

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DC 20
31 mm²
Digi 3 LM
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC 20 and Digi 3 LM have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 20MetricDigi 3 LM
2 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
90 gWeight90 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 20 and Digi 3 LM have the same sensor area. The DC 20 and Digi 3 LM have the same body weight. The Digi 3 LM has the higher effective resolution. The Digi 3 LM is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 20

Released in 2004, DC 20 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digi 3 LM

Released in 2005, Digi 3 LM has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras