CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax Optio WG-10
vs Pentax Optio WG-3

Archive illustration for Pentax Optio WG-10

Pentax / 2013

Optio WG-10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax Optio WG-3

Pentax / 2013

Optio WG-3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Optio WG-10
28 mm²
Optio WG-3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Optio WG-10 and Optio WG-3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Optio WG-10MetricOptio WG-3
14 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
167 gWeight230 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion D-LI92 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion D-LI92 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Optio WG-10 and Optio WG-3 have the same sensor area. The Optio WG-10 has the lighter body. The Optio WG-3 has the higher effective resolution. The Optio WG-10 and Optio WG-3 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Optio WG-10

Released in 2013, Optio WG-10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optio WG-3

Released in 2013, Optio WG-3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras