CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS
vs Pentax X-5

Archive illustration for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS

Pentax / 2012

Optio WG-2 GPS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax X-5

Pentax / 2012

X-5

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Optio WG-2 GPS
28 mm²
X-5
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The Optio WG-2 GPS has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Optio WG-2 GPSMetricX-5
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.73 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density57.71 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
198 gWeight595 g
Internal storageStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion D-LI92 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBattery4 x AA batteries (Alkaline, Lithium, Nickel and Rechargeable Ni-MH)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Optio WG-2 GPS has the larger sensor area. The Optio WG-2 GPS has the lighter body. The Optio WG-2 GPS and X-5 have the same effective resolution. The Optio WG-2 GPS and X-5 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Optio WG-2 GPS

Released in 2012, Optio WG-2 GPS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose X-5

Released in 2012, X-5 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 595 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras