CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax K-5
vs Pentax K-r

Archive illustration for Pentax K-5

Pentax / 2010

K-5

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax K-r

Pentax / 2010

K-r

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

371 mm²
K-5
373 mm²
K-r
Area ratio
1.01:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
0.6%

The K-r has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

K-5MetricK-r
16.3 MPEffective pixels12.4 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.6 × 15.8
4.77 µmPixel pitch5.48 µm
22.73 µm²Pixel area30.07 µm²
4.4 MP/cm²Pixel density3.33 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.52
—Maximum video—
740 gWeight598 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion D-LI90 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion D-LI109 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The K-r has the larger sensor area. The K-r has the lighter body. The K-5 has the higher effective resolution. The K-5 and K-r were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose K-5

Released in 2010, K-5 has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 740 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose K-r

Released in 2010, K-r has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 598 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras