CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax *ist DS2
vs Pentax K10D

Archive illustration for Pentax *ist DS2

Pentax / 2005

*ist DS2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax K10D

Pentax / 2006

K10D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

369 mm²
*ist DS2
369 mm²
K10D
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The *ist DS2 and K10D have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

*ist DS2MetricK10D
6.1 MPEffective pixels10 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
7.78 µmPixel pitch6.07 µm
60.48 µm²Pixel area36.89 µm²
1.65 MP/cm²Pixel density2.71 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
470 gWeight710 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The *ist DS2 and K10D have the same sensor area. The *ist DS2 has the lighter body. The K10D has the higher effective resolution. The K10D is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose *ist DS2

Released in 2005, *ist DS2 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 470 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose K10D

Released in 2006, K10D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 710 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras