CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax EI-2000
vs Pentax Optio 330

Archive illustration for Pentax EI-2000

Pentax / 2000

EI-2000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax Optio 330

Pentax / 2001

Optio 330

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
EI-2000
38 mm²
Optio 330
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
20 mm²
Relative difference
53.3%

The EI-2000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EI-2000MetricOptio 330
1.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor7.11 × 5.33
5.53 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
30.57 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
3.27 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
630 gWeight245 g
Compact FlashStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EI-2000 has the larger sensor area. The Optio 330 has the lighter body. The Optio 330 has the higher effective resolution. The Optio 330 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EI-2000

Released in 2000, EI-2000 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 630 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optio 330

Released in 2001, Optio 330 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras