CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax EI-100
vs Pentax EI-200

Archive illustration for Pentax EI-100

Pentax / 2001

EI-100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax EI-200

Pentax / 2000

EI-200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
EI-100
21 mm²
EI-200
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The EI-200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EI-100MetricEI-200
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.33 × 4
3.55 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
12.64 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
7.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
240 gWeight390 g
Internal storageStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EI-200 has the larger sensor area. The EI-100 has the lighter body. The EI-200 has the higher effective resolution. The EI-100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EI-100

Released in 2001, EI-100 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EI-200

Released in 2000, EI-200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 390 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras