CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax Efina
vs Pentax MX-1

Archive illustration for Pentax Efina

Pentax / 2013

Efina

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax MX-1

Pentax / 2013

MX-1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Efina
42 mm²
MX-1
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The MX-1 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EfinaMetricMX-1
14 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.88 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area3.54 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density28.26 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
108 gWeight391 g
SD/SDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable lithium-ion battery D-LI108 Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion D-Li-106 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The MX-1 has the larger sensor area. The Efina has the lighter body. The Efina has the higher effective resolution. The Efina and MX-1 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Efina

Released in 2013, Efina has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 108 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose MX-1

Released in 2013, MX-1 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 391 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras