CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT30
vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Archive illustration for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT30

Panasonic / 2015

Lumix DMC-FT30

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic / 2015

Lumix DMC-FZ300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Lumix DMC-FT30
28 mm²
Lumix DMC-FZ300
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The Lumix DMC-FZ300 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Lumix DMC-FT30MetricLumix DMC-FZ300
16.1 MPEffective pixels12.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
1.72 µm²Pixel area2.35 µm²
58.07 MP/cm²Pixel density42.52 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
144 gWeight691 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Li-ion Battery Pack Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-ion Battery Pack Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Lumix DMC-FZ300 has the larger sensor area. The Lumix DMC-FT30 has the lighter body. The Lumix DMC-FT30 has the higher effective resolution. The Lumix DMC-FT30 and Lumix DMC-FZ300 were both released in 2015. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FT30

Released in 2015, Lumix DMC-FT30 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 144 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FZ300

Released in 2015, Lumix DMC-FZ300 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 691 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras