CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3
vs Rollei Compactline 81

Archive illustration for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Panasonic / 2008

Lumix DMC-FS3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 81

Rollei / 2010

Compactline 81

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Lumix DMC-FS3
25 mm²
Compactline 81
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Lumix DMC-FS3 and Compactline 81 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Lumix DMC-FS3MetricCompactline 81
8.1 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.75 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.07 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.61 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
158 gWeight82 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Lumix DMC-FS3 and Compactline 81 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 81 has the lighter body. The Lumix DMC-FS3 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 81 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FS3

Released in 2008, Lumix DMC-FS3 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 158 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Compactline 81

Released in 2010, Compactline 81 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras