Reasons to choose VR-340
Released in 2012, VR-340 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus VR-340
vs Olympus VR-350
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
VR-34028 mm²
VR-350- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The VR-340 and VR-350 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
VR-340MetricVR-350
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
170 gWeight170 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC
Lithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The VR-340 and VR-350 have the same sensor area. The VR-340 and VR-350 have the same body weight. The VR-340 and VR-350 have the same effective resolution. The VR-340 and VR-350 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose VR-350
Released in 2012, VR-350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.