Reasons to choose VH-410
Released in 2012, VH-410 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 152 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus VH-410
vs Olympus VR-340
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
VH-41028 mm²
VR-340- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The VH-410 and VR-340 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
VH-410MetricVR-340
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
152 gWeight170 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The VH-410 and VR-340 have the same sensor area. The VH-410 has the lighter body. The VH-410 and VR-340 have the same effective resolution. The VH-410 and VR-340 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose VR-340
Released in 2012, VR-340 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.