CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
vs Olympus VG-165

Archive illustration for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS

Olympus / 2013

Tough TG-2 iHS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus VG-165

Olympus / 2013

VG-165

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Tough TG-2 iHS
28 mm²
VG-165
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Tough TG-2 iHS and VG-165 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Tough TG-2 iHSMetricVG-165
12 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video—
230 gWeight122 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion Rechargeable Battery (LI-90B) Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium ion battery (LI-42B)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Tough TG-2 iHS and VG-165 have the same sensor area. The VG-165 has the lighter body. The VG-165 has the higher effective resolution. The Tough TG-2 iHS and VG-165 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Tough TG-2 iHS

Released in 2013, Tough TG-2 iHS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VG-165

Released in 2013, VG-165 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 122 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras