Reasons to choose TG-320
Released in 2012, TG-320 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus TG-320
vs Olympus VG-170
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
TG-32028 mm²
VG-170- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The TG-320 and VG-170 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
TG-320MetricVG-170
14 MPEffective pixels14.5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.96 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density50.95 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight147 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-ion rechargeable LI-42B battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The TG-320 and VG-170 have the same sensor area. The VG-170 has the lighter body. The VG-170 has the higher effective resolution. The TG-320 and VG-170 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose VG-170
Released in 2012, VG-170 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.5 MP effective resolution, and a 147 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.