CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
vs Olympus VR-360

Archive illustration for Olympus SZ-31MR iHS

Olympus / 2012

SZ-31MR iHS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus VR-360

Olympus / 2012

VR-360

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
SZ-31MR iHS
28 mm²
VR-360
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The SZ-31MR iHS and VR-360 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

SZ-31MR iHSMetricVR-360
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
226 gWeight172 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SZ-31MR iHS and VR-360 have the same sensor area. The VR-360 has the lighter body. The SZ-31MR iHS and VR-360 have the same effective resolution. The SZ-31MR iHS and VR-360 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose SZ-31MR iHS

Released in 2012, SZ-31MR iHS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 226 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VR-360

Released in 2012, VR-360 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 172 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras