Reasons to choose Stylus XZ-10
Released in 2013, Stylus XZ-10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 221 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus Stylus XZ-10
vs Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Stylus XZ-1028 mm²
Tough TG-2 iHS- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Stylus XZ-10 and Tough TG-2 iHS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Stylus XZ-10MetricTough TG-2 iHS
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
221 gWeight230 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LI-50B Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion Rechargeable Battery (LI-90B) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Stylus XZ-10 and Tough TG-2 iHS have the same sensor area. The Stylus XZ-10 has the lighter body. The Stylus XZ-10 and Tough TG-2 iHS have the same effective resolution. The Stylus XZ-10 and Tough TG-2 iHS were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Tough TG-2 iHS
Released in 2013, Tough TG-2 iHS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.