CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus Stylus XZ-10
vs Olympus TG-630 iHS

Archive illustration for Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Olympus / 2013

Stylus XZ-10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus TG-630 iHS

Olympus / 2013

TG-630 iHS

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Stylus XZ-10
28 mm²
TG-630 iHS
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Stylus XZ-10 and TG-630 iHS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Stylus XZ-10MetricTG-630 iHS
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
221 gWeight167 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LI-50B Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Stylus XZ-10 and TG-630 iHS have the same sensor area. The TG-630 iHS has the lighter body. The Stylus XZ-10 and TG-630 iHS have the same effective resolution. The Stylus XZ-10 and TG-630 iHS were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Stylus XZ-10

Released in 2013, Stylus XZ-10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 221 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TG-630 iHS

Released in 2013, TG-630 iHS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras