Reasons to choose SP 810 UZ
Released in 2011, SP 810 UZ has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 413 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus SP 810 UZ
vs Olympus TG-320
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
SP 810 UZ28 mm²
TG-320- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The SP 810 UZ and TG-320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
SP 810 UZMetricTG-320
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
413 gWeight155 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-42B battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The SP 810 UZ and TG-320 have the same sensor area. The TG-320 has the lighter body. The SP 810 UZ and TG-320 have the same effective resolution. The TG-320 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose TG-320
Released in 2012, TG-320 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.