CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ
vs Samsung TL350

Archive illustration for Olympus SP-565UZ

Olympus / 2008

SP-565UZ

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung TL350

Samsung / 2010

TL350

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
SP-565UZ
28 mm²
TL350
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The SP-565UZ and TL350 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

SP-565UZMetricTL350
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
413 gWeight195 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion SLB-11A battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SP-565UZ and TL350 have the same sensor area. The TL350 has the lighter body. The SP-565UZ and TL350 have the same effective resolution. The TL350 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose SP-565UZ

Released in 2008, SP-565UZ has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 413 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL350

Released in 2010, TL350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras