CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus Mju 7050
vs Olympus TG-610

Archive illustration for Olympus Mju 7050

Olympus / 2010

Mju 7050

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus TG-610

Olympus / 2011

TG-610

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Mju 7050
28 mm²
TG-610
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mju 7050 and TG-610 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mju 7050MetricTG-610
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight190 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mju 7050 and TG-610 have the same sensor area. The Mju 7050 has the lighter body. The Mju 7050 and TG-610 have the same effective resolution. The TG-610 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mju 7050

Released in 2010, Mju 7050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TG-610

Released in 2011, TG-610 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras