CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-5050
vs Olympus TG-610

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-5050

Olympus / 2010

FE-5050

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus TG-610

Olympus / 2011

TG-610

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
FE-5050
28 mm²
TG-610
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-5050 and TG-610 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-5050MetricTG-610
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight190 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
BLM-5 Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-50B battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-5050 and TG-610 have the same sensor area. The FE-5050 has the lighter body. The FE-5050 and TG-610 have the same effective resolution. The TG-610 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-5050

Released in 2010, FE-5050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TG-610

Released in 2011, TG-610 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras