CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-360
vs Olympus SP 800 UZ

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-360

Olympus / 2008

FE-360

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus SP 800 UZ

Olympus / 2010

SP 800 UZ

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

27 mm²
FE-360
28 mm²
SP 800 UZ
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
1.7%

The SP 800 UZ has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-360MetricSP 800 UZ
8 MPEffective pixels14.7 MP
6.03 × 4.52Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.85 µmPixel pitch1.37 µm
3.41 µm²Pixel area1.89 µm²
29.35 MP/cm²Pixel density53.02 MP/cm²
5.74Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
151 gWeight435 g
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion (LI-42B) Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SP 800 UZ has the larger sensor area. The FE-360 has the lighter body. The SP 800 UZ has the higher effective resolution. The SP 800 UZ is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-360

Released in 2008, FE-360 has about 27 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 151 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SP 800 UZ

Released in 2010, SP 800 UZ has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.7 MP effective resolution, and a 435 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras