CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-340
vs Samsung TL350

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-340

Olympus / 2008

FE-340

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung TL350

Samsung / 2010

TL350

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

27 mm²
FE-340
28 mm²
TL350
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
1.7%

The TL350 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-340MetricTL350
8 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.03 × 4.52Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.85 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
3.41 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
29.35 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
5.74Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
116 gWeight195 g
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion (LI-42B) Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-11A battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The TL350 has the larger sensor area. The FE-340 has the lighter body. The TL350 has the higher effective resolution. The TL350 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-340

Released in 2008, FE-340 has about 27 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL350

Released in 2010, TL350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras