CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-300
vs Praktica Luxmedia 12 HD

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-300

Olympus / 2007

FE-300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 12 HD

Praktica / 2009

Luxmedia 12 HD

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
FE-300
42 mm²
Luxmedia 12 HD
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-300 and Luxmedia 12 HD have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-300MetricLuxmedia 12 HD
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
7.44 × 5.58Sensor7.44 × 5.58
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
3.46 µm²Pixel area3.46 µm²
28.91 MP/cm²Pixel density28.91 MP/cm²
4.65Crop factor4.65
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight136 g
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-300 and Luxmedia 12 HD have the same sensor area. The FE-300 has the lighter body. The FE-300 and Luxmedia 12 HD have the same effective resolution. The Luxmedia 12 HD is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-300

Released in 2007, FE-300 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 12 HD

Released in 2009, Luxmedia 12 HD has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 136 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras