CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-250
vs Praktica Luxmedia 8003

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-250

Olympus / 2007

FE-250

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 8003

Praktica / 2005

Luxmedia 8003

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
FE-250
38 mm²
Luxmedia 8003
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-250 and Luxmedia 8003 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-250MetricLuxmedia 8003
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight140 g
xD Picture cardStorageSecure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-250 and Luxmedia 8003 have the same sensor area. The FE-250 has the lighter body. The FE-250 and Luxmedia 8003 have the same effective resolution. The FE-250 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-250

Released in 2007, FE-250 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 8003

Released in 2005, Luxmedia 8003 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras