CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-170
vs Rollei RCP-7430XW

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-170

Olympus / 2006

FE-170

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-7430XW

Rollei / 2008

RCP-7430XW

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
FE-170
25 mm²
RCP-7430XW
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-170 and RCP-7430XW have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-170MetricRCP-7430XW
6 MPEffective pixels7.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch1.87 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area3.5 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density28.58 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
124 gWeight124 g
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-170 and RCP-7430XW have the same sensor area. The FE-170 and RCP-7430XW have the same body weight. The RCP-7430XW has the higher effective resolution. The RCP-7430XW is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-170

Released in 2006, FE-170 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 124 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-7430XW

Released in 2008, RCP-7430XW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 124 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras