CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus E-30
vs Sigma SD15

Archive illustration for Olympus E-30

Olympus / 2008

E-30

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sigma SD15

Sigma / 2010

SD15

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

225 mm²
E-30
286 mm²
SD15
Area ratio
1.27:1
Absolute difference
61 mm²
Relative difference
27%

The SD15 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

E-30MetricSD15
12.3 MPEffective pixels4.7 MP
17.3 × 13Sensor20.7 × 13.8
4.28 µmPixel pitch7.8 µm
18.28 µm²Pixel area60.78 µm²
5.47 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
2Crop factor1.74
—Maximum video—
695 gWeight750 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture CardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
BLM-1 Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SD15 has the larger sensor area. The E-30 has the lighter body. The E-30 has the higher effective resolution. The SD15 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E-30

Released in 2008, E-30 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 695 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SD15

Released in 2010, SD15 has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 4.7 MP effective resolution, and a 750 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras