Reasons to choose D-535 Zoom
Released in 2004, D-535 Zoom has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus D-535 Zoom
vs Olympus FE-130
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
D-535 Zoom25 mm²
FE-130- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The FE-130 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
D-535 ZoomMetricFE-130
3.1 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
190 gWeight130 g
Internal storageStoragexD Picture card
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The FE-130 has the larger sensor area. The FE-130 has the lighter body. The FE-130 has the higher effective resolution. The FE-130 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose FE-130
Released in 2006, FE-130 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.