CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus D-300L
vs Olympus D-600L

Archive illustration for Olympus D-300L

Olympus / 1996

D-300L

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus D-600L

Olympus / 1997

D-600L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
D-300L
58 mm²
D-600L
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The D-300L and D-600L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D-300LMetricD-600L
0.8 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
8.52 µmPixel pitch6.68 µm
72.6 µm²Pixel area44.68 µm²
1.38 MP/cm²Pixel density2.24 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight410 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D-300L and D-600L have the same sensor area. The D-300L has the lighter body. The D-600L has the higher effective resolution. The D-600L is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D-300L

Released in 1996, D-300L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-600L

Released in 1997, D-600L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 410 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras