CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus D-300L
vs Olympus D-500L

Archive illustration for Olympus D-300L

Olympus / 1996

D-300L

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus D-500L

Olympus / 1997

D-500L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
D-300L
58 mm²
D-500L
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The D-300L and D-500L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D-300LMetricD-500L
0.8 MPEffective pixels0.8 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
8.52 µmPixel pitch8.52 µm
72.6 µm²Pixel area72.6 µm²
1.38 MP/cm²Pixel density1.38 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight490 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D-300L and D-500L have the same sensor area. The D-300L has the lighter body. The D-300L and D-500L have the same effective resolution. The D-500L is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D-300L

Released in 1996, D-300L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-500L

Released in 1997, D-500L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 490 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras