Reasons to choose C-770 UZ
Released in 2004, C-770 UZ has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus C-770 UZ
vs Olympus FE-200
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
C-770 UZ25 mm²
FE-200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The C-770 UZ and FE-200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
C-770 UZMetricFE-200
3.9 MPEffective pixels6 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.52 µmPixel pitch2.03 µm
6.37 µm²Pixel area4.14 µm²
15.7 MP/cm²Pixel density24.15 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight155 g
xD Picture CardStoragexD Picture card
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The C-770 UZ and FE-200 have the same sensor area. The FE-200 has the lighter body. The FE-200 has the higher effective resolution. The FE-200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose FE-200
Released in 2006, FE-200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.