CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-750 UZ
vs Rollei dk4010

Archive illustration for Olympus C-750 UZ

Olympus / 2003

C-750 UZ

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
C-750 UZ
21 mm²
dk4010
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-750 UZ and dk4010 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-750 UZMetricdk4010
3.9 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.34 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
5.47 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
18.29 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
387 gWeight350 g
xD Picture cardStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)Battery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-750 UZ and dk4010 have the same sensor area. The dk4010 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-750 UZ

Released in 2003, C-750 UZ has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 387 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras