CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-720 UZ
vs Olympus mju mini Digital

Archive illustration for Olympus C-720 UZ

Olympus / 2002

C-720 UZ

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus mju mini Digital

Olympus / 2004

mju mini Digital

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
C-720 UZ
25 mm²
mju mini Digital
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-720 UZ and mju mini Digital have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-720 UZMetricmju mini Digital
3 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.88 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
8.28 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
12.08 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
397 gWeight115 g
SmartMediaStoragexD Picture card
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-720 UZ and mju mini Digital have the same sensor area. The mju mini Digital has the lighter body. The mju mini Digital has the higher effective resolution. The mju mini Digital is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-720 UZ

Released in 2002, C-720 UZ has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3 MP effective resolution, and a 397 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose mju mini Digital

Released in 2004, mju mini Digital has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras