CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-450 Zoom
vs Olympus IR-300

Archive illustration for Olympus C-450 Zoom

Olympus / 2003

C-450 Zoom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus IR-300

Olympus / 2005

IR-300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
C-450 Zoom
25 mm²
IR-300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-450 Zoom and IR-300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-450 ZoomMetricIR-300
4 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.49 µmPixel pitch2.25 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area5.07 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density19.73 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
170 gWeight160 g
xD Picture cardStorageInternal storage
1x CR-V3, 2x AABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-450 Zoom and IR-300 have the same sensor area. The IR-300 has the lighter body. The IR-300 has the higher effective resolution. The IR-300 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-450 Zoom

Released in 2003, C-450 Zoom has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose IR-300

Released in 2005, IR-300 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras