CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-3000 Zoom
vs Pentax Optio 330RS

Archive illustration for Olympus C-3000 Zoom

Olympus / 2000

C-3000 Zoom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax Optio 330RS

Pentax / 2002

Optio 330RS

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
C-3000 Zoom
38 mm²
Optio 330RS
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-3000 Zoom and Optio 330RS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-3000 ZoomMetricOptio 330RS
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
380 gWeight235 g
SmartMediaStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-3000 Zoom and Optio 330RS have the same sensor area. The Optio 330RS has the lighter body. The C-3000 Zoom and Optio 330RS have the same effective resolution. The Optio 330RS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-3000 Zoom

Released in 2000, C-3000 Zoom has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 380 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optio 330RS

Released in 2002, Optio 330RS has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 235 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras