CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-21
vs Olympus D-360L

Archive illustration for Olympus C-21

Olympus / 1999

C-21

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus D-360L

Olympus / 2000

D-360L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
C-21
38 mm²
D-360L
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The D-360L has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-21MetricD-360L
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.02 µmPixel pitch5.62 µm
16.17 µm²Pixel area31.58 µm²
6.18 MP/cm²Pixel density3.17 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
240 gWeight280 g
SmartMediaStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D-360L has the larger sensor area. The C-21 has the lighter body. The C-21 has the higher effective resolution. The D-360L is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-21

Released in 1999, C-21 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-360L

Released in 2000, D-360L has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras