CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-150
vs Rollei dk4010

Archive illustration for Olympus C-150

Olympus / 2003

C-150

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
C-150
21 mm²
dk4010
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The dk4010 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-150Metricdk4010
2 MPEffective pixels4 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.33 × 4
2.75 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
210 gWeight350 g
xD Picture cardStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dk4010 has the larger sensor area. The C-150 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-150

Released in 2003, C-150 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras