CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon E2Ns
vs Nikon E2s

Archive illustration for Nikon E2Ns

Nikon / 1997

E2Ns

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon E2s

Nikon / 1996

E2s

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
E2Ns
58 mm²
E2s
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The E2Ns and E2s have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

E2NsMetricE2s
1.4 MPEffective pixels1.4 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
6.44 µmPixel pitch6.44 µm
41.49 µm²Pixel area41.49 µm²
2.41 MP/cm²Pixel density2.41 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
—Storage—
NiMH accuBatteryNiMH accu

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The E2Ns and E2s have the same sensor area. The E2Ns and E2s have the same body weight. The E2Ns and E2s have the same effective resolution. The E2Ns is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E2Ns

Released in 1997, E2Ns has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E2s

Released in 1996, E2s has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras