CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D3X
vs Nikon D5100

Archive illustration for Nikon D3X

Nikon / 2008

D3X

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D5100

Nikon / 2011

D5100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

862 mm²
D3X
368 mm²
D5100
Area ratio
2.34:1
Absolute difference
493 mm²
Relative difference
134%

The D3X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 3 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D3XMetricD5100
24.5 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
35.9 × 24Sensor23.6 × 15.6
5.93 µmPixel pitch4.77 µm
35.17 µm²Pixel area22.73 µm²
2.84 MP/cm²Pixel density4.4 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
1,260 gWeight560 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II) x 2, UDMAStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion EN-EL4a rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion EN-EL14 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D3X has the larger sensor area. The D5100 has the lighter body. The D3X has the higher effective resolution. The D5100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D3X

Released in 2008, D3X has about 862 mm² of sensor area, 24.5 MP effective resolution, and a 1,260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D5100

Released in 2011, D5100 has about 368 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 560 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras