Reasons to choose D3400
Released in 2016, D3400 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 395 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon D3400
vs Sony Alpha a6300
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
D3400367 mm²
Alpha a6300- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The D3400 and Alpha a6300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
D3400MetricAlpha a6300
24.2 MPEffective pixels24.2 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.89 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
15.15 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
6.6 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
395 gWeight404 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo
EN-EL14a lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-FW50 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The D3400 and Alpha a6300 have the same sensor area. The D3400 has the lighter body. The D3400 and Alpha a6300 have the same effective resolution. The D3400 and Alpha a6300 were both released in 2016. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Alpha a6300
Released in 2016, Alpha a6300 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 404 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.