CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D3200
vs Nikon D90

Archive illustration for Nikon D3200

Nikon / 2012

D3200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D90

Nikon / 2008

D90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

357 mm²
D3200
373 mm²
D90
Area ratio
1.04:1
Absolute difference
16 mm²
Relative difference
4.4%

The D90 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 4 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D3200MetricD90
24.2 MPEffective pixels12.3 MP
23.2 × 15.4Sensor23.6 × 15.8
3.84 µmPixel pitch5.51 µm
14.76 µm²Pixel area30.32 µm²
6.77 MP/cm²Pixel density3.3 MP/cm²
1.55Crop factor1.52
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,280 × 720
505 gWeight703 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliantStorageSD/SDHC
Lithium-Ion EN-EL14 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion EN-EL3e rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D90 has the larger sensor area. The D3200 has the lighter body. The D3200 has the higher effective resolution. The D3200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D3200

Released in 2012, D3200 has about 357 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 505 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D90

Released in 2008, D90 has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 703 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras